Chronicon Wormatiense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Chronicon Wormatiense[1] is a fragmentary anonymous Latin chronicle of the city of Worms, Germany.[2] It was probably composed in the last quarter of the 13th century.[3] There is an English translation by David Bachrach.[4]

The original text of the Chronicon does not survive complete.[2] The definitive critical edition, superseding earlier ones, such as the MGH edition, was published by Heinrich Boos [de] in 1893. The most important two manuscripts are a 16th-century codex from Darmstadt and an 18th-century codex from Frankfurt.[5] The edited Chronicon contains a short introductory paragraph on the Merovingian period.[6] Then follows a chronological account of the years 1221–1261 plus comments on 1297 and 1298.[2][7] The full extent of the original is not known.[2] If the notes on 1297–1298 were added later, then the original may have been completed as early as the 1260s.[6]

The Chronicon combines features of two genres. On the one hand, it resembles a gesta episcoporum, a collection of short biographies of a succession of bishops, a genre which originates with the collection of papal biographies known as the Liber pontificalis. On the other hand, it resembles a municipal history, like the contemporary Annales Wormatienses.[8] In fact, the Chronicon complements the Annales. It is the work of a clergyman written from the perspective of the bishop of Worms, while the Annales is the work of a layman whose perspective is that of the city council.[2] One of the purposes of the anonymous author is to defend the properties, rights and prerogatives of the bishop, and to show that the interests of the citizens are best advanced under the protection of a strong bishop. As in a gesta, documents are frequently cited and sometimes copied or excerpted into the narrative to substantiate a claim. Unlike a gesta, the narrative is not organized by the lives or reigns of the bishops.[8]

The anonymous author of the Chronicon does not leave a personal imprint on his work. He never claims to be an eyewitness or to have received his information from eyewitnesses.[3] Where his citations and quotations of documents can be checked, he proves to be completely accurate.[9] He probably worked for the bishop.[3] The bishops whose reigns he covers are Henry II (1217–1234), Landolf (1234–1247), Richard (1247–1257), and Eberhard (1257–1277).[8] The Chronicon can be divided as follows:

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Per Büttner 2016, also called the Chronicon episcoporum Wormatiensium ('chronicle of the bishops of Worms') or Ältere Bischofschronik ('older bishops' chronicle'). Whalen 2019, p. 159, calls it the Chronicle of Worms.
  2. ^ a b c d e Büttner 2016.
  3. ^ a b c Bachrach 2014, p. 19.
  4. ^ Bachrach 2014, pp. 81–128.
  5. ^ Bachrach 2014, pp. 26–27, citing Boos 1893.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h Bachrach 2014, pp. 20–21.
  7. ^ Bachrach 2014, p. 83.
  8. ^ a b c Bachrach 2014, pp. 9–10.
  9. ^ Bachrach 2014, p. 21.
  10. ^ Bachrach 2014, p. 81.
  11. ^ Bachrach 2014, pp. 81–83.
  12. ^ Bachrach 2014, pp. 83–84.
  13. ^ Bachrach 2014, p. 84.
  14. ^ Loud 2016, p. 92.
  15. ^ Bachrach 2014, pp. 84–87.
  16. ^ Bachrach 2014, p. 88.
  17. ^ Bachrach 2014, pp. 88–127.
  18. ^ Bachrach 2014, pp. 127–128.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Bachrach, David S., ed. (2014). The Histories of a Medieval German City, Worms c. 1000–c. 1300: Translation and Commentary. Ashgate.
  • Boos, Heinrich (1893). Monumenta Wormatiensia: Annalen und Chroniken. Weidmann.
  • Büttner, Jan Ulrich (2016). "Chronicon Wormatiense". In G. Dunphy; C. Bratu (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Medieval Chronicle. Brill Online. doi:10.1163/2213-2139_emc_SIM_000654. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  • Loud, G. A. (2016). "The Papal 'Crusade' against Frederick II in 1228–1230". In M. Balard (ed.). The Papacy and the Crusades. Routledge. pp. 91–103.
  • Whalen, Brett Edward (2019). The Two Powers: The Papacy, the Empire, and the Struggle for Sovereignty in the Thirteenth Century. University of Pennsylvania Press.