Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Assessment/A-Class review

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thoughts to consider

[edit]
  1. Automating the nom page's creation (either MILHIST-style via project talk page box, AFD-style, or something else). Obviously, it's easier to not need bots. Open to ideas here. (Edit: somewhat automated creation until {{WPVG}} tag is worked out—try it out on the main page)
  2. Renaming this page A-Class assessment or A-Class candidates or A-Class nominations instead of A-Class review. The precedence is that MILHIST does "ACR" and thus that was the name mentioned in Torchiest's feature, but with "review" comes possibly negative connotations. A-Class assessment (ACA) may be a preferable acronym. Thoughts?
  3. Most of the WP documentation refers to "A-Class" (like the Mercedes series) but I believe the correct spelling is "A-class" since it "class" modifies the first word ("A"). Consensus?
  4. Since subpages for reviews is a new step, I stopped at just making the new page, keeping current procedure. We should eventually discuss closing assessments, whether we want specific A-Class criteria. No rush.
czar · · 05:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to see this is moving forward! I'll post some comments over the weekend. —Torchiest talkedits 22:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(1) Automating nom creation

[edit]
I'd asked Kirill Lokshin about how to set up the process, since he was the one who did it for MILHIST, back in January. The original thread is here; perhaps you can pick up the thread and see if he'll help us out. —Torchiest talkedits 21:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(2) ACR vs. ACA

[edit]

(3) A-Class vs. A-class

[edit]

(4) Procedure

[edit]