Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Dutch military history task force/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Battle of Java[edit]

Battle of Java already has an article - Battle of the Java Sea. Do you think the Royal Netherlands Navy article should have a history of the navy section or a seperate history page like History of the Royal Navy? I'll start one if so Chwyatt 20:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I mean the land battle for Java. And I think a History of the Royal Netherlands Navy would be the best (considering the massive amount of conflicts) Rex 20:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Open tasks[edit]

I've split out the simpler tasks (requested articles, in this case) into a new template which is transcluded in the main project open task list. This will hopefully bring more attention to these. Please feel free to add additional tasks (currently in one of three types); ideas for other types of work to include are also welcome! Kirill Lokshin 18:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article improvements[edit]

Hi all. Doing a quick scan I found only one article in our domain being featured William the Silent, and 1 in the A-class Market-Garden, and none in the Good-Article Class. This means that quality improvement could be a usefull initiative for this task force. I think one of our aims might be to classify a few articles as being of utmost importance (personally I would say Eighty Years War should be one) and make a (priority) list of about 5 highly important articles that have a low quality, on the to do list in order to get these very important articles up to Good, A-class or even featured quality as soon as possible. How do you all think about that?

Suggestions

other options?? Arnoutf 10:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Off the top of my head, Maurice of Nassau is clearly a figure of profound importance, but his article is fairly lacking in material. I don't know how many people interested in the topic there might be, though. Kirill Lokshin 15:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project directory[edit]

Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 21:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch occupation in World War II[edit]

Hi, I recently completed some translations on Meinoud Rost van Tonningen, Henk Feldmeijer and Hanns Albin Rauter. These are not directly military related, think I could at them to this tag?--MarcoLittel 11:27, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Feldmeijer should be tagged in any case, as he actually served as an officer in the Waffen-SS. The other two, I'm not sure; we've tagged politicians before when they had some significant role in military affairs, but I'm not sure that jut being collaborators would be a good reason, as they wouldn't necessarily have any military-related content in the articles themselves. Kirill Lokshin 13:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battles of the Netherlands[edit]

Hi, a lot of the battles listed in the Category Battles of the Netherlands are not of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (1815-) as defined in the header of the category. Should we expand the category definition?MarcoLittel 09:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What country are they related to, then? If they're from one of the earlier states there, they just need to be moved to the correct category (e.g. Category:Battles of the United Provinces). Kirill Lokshin 13:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll look into it later in the week. Looks like not many articles will be left in this category.MarcoLittel 14:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just noticed you added the necessary categories to the project page, thanks :) MarcoLittel 14:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV?[edit]

Some person edited Battle of Bornholm (1676) with some controversial edits? Can you please take a look at it. Please see the Wikiproject talk page for more. --Ineffable3000 22:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Rex 22:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Spanish army during the 80 years war (1568-1648)[edit]

Just a question of curiosity. The Spanish army in what is now Belgium and the Netherlands, the army at battles like Jemmingen and Turnhout; were the Spanish army soldiers recruited in the Low Countries or from Spain proper? Thanks Chwyatt 18:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmmm good question, I think quit a few were from Spain (or other Burgundian territories) at least the commanders were. However if you read the reports of mutiny, a lot of them were bound to be mercenaries, that may have had no proper allegiance and may have come from Austria or Greece. Arnoutf 18:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Arnoutf. Chwyatt 11:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

William the Silent[edit]

William the Silent has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

This article has been reviewed as part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force for GA sweeps. I think the article currently doesn't meet the requirements of the Good article criteria concerning sourcing. Although the article is well-sourced in many areas, other areas are lacking. I have listed the article at Good article reassessment to get a better consensus on the article's status. Issues needing to be address are listed there. Please join the discussion to see how the article can be improved to prevent delisting. If you have any questions about the reassessement, leave me a message on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Regards, --Nehrams2020 (talk) 02:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme[edit]

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

  • The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
  • The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
  • A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Dutch military history[edit]

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:05, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Midshipman[edit]

I need help with this article for Adelborst, which I'm pretty sure means Midshipman in Dutch. The Dutch pages of the Koninklijk Instituut voor de Marine probably have the information but Dutch isn't one of the languages I can read. Just needs a reference and ideally some images of the rank insignia. Thanks! Kirk (talk) 17:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is kind of late, but did you try Google Translate? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 06:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - I did but I also looked in a Dutch - English dictionary in my library for the definition. I made up my own insignia, but any other reputable sources would be helpful.Kirk (talk) 20:26, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWII: Resistance in the vicinity of Eindhoven[edit]

Please note the query I've posted to the Talk:Oirschot page. -- Thanks, Deborahjay (talk) 07:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the query and have no idea. :-) You may get a wider audience by posting the question on the main project talk page. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 06:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to popular pages lists[edit]

There are a few important changes to the popular pages system. A quick summary:

  • The "importance" ranking (for projects that use it) will be included in the lists along with assessment.
  • The default list size has been lowered to 500 entries (from 1000)
  • I've set up a project on the Toolserver for the popular pages - tools:~alexz/pop/.
    • This includes a page to view the results for projects, including the in-progress results from the current month. Currently this can only show the results from a single project in one month. Features to see multiple projects or multiple months may be added later.
    • This includes a new interface for making requests to add a new project to the list.
    • There is also a form to request a change to the configuration for a project. Currently the configurable options are the size of the on-wiki list and the project subpage used for the list.
  • The on-wiki list should be generated and posted in a more timely and consistent manner than before.
  • The data is now retained indefinitely.
  • The script used to generate the pages has changed. The output should be the same. Please report any apparent inconsistencies (see below).
  • Bugs and feature requests should be reported using the Toolserver's bug tracker for "alexz's tools" - [1]

-- Mr.Z-man 00:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!

Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder but, with about 18 hours to go until nominations close, you'll need to get your skates on if you're thinking of standing as a coordinator. The election is based on self-nominations, so please don't be shy in putting your name forward. The last elections will give you an idea of what to expect.
Otherwise, voting starts tonight at 00:01 (UTC). Any member of the project may support as many of the candidates as they wish. You should cast your votes here.
 Roger Davies talk 06:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! Abraham, B.S. (talk) 13:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP 1.0 bot announcement[edit]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article candidacy for Dutch 1913 battleship proposal now open[edit]

The featured article candidacy for Dutch 1913 battleship proposal is now open. Comments from reviewers are needed to help determine whether the article meets the criteria for featured articles; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! Nick-D (talk) 22:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featured list candidacy for Order of battle at the Battle of Camperdown now open[edit]

The featured list candidacy for Order of battle at the Battle of Camperdown is now open. Comments from reviewers are needed to help determine whether the article meets the criteria for featured lists; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! Mm40 (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The peer review for List of Commando raids on the Atlantic wall is now open; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! -MBK004 19:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]