Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force/Newsletter/12-08-2007

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Project

This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This page is within the scope of Wines task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

edit
history
watch
purge

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

GA

Um, since when was GA "going through some rough patches"? There's a backlog, but it's being steadily brought down by many dedicated members. If you have a problem with a review, the reassessment discussion group is active. Also, sweeps of current GA-class articles are being done to ensure continued quality. I see no rough patch here, just more activity. Next time, I would suggest leaving one's personal gripes with GA out of the project newsletter. VanTucky ^talk 21:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "rough patches" is not a personal gripe nor is it an attack on the project. It is just an observation and I will note that I did encourage any editor interested in the process to feel free to nominate an article if they wish. There is no need to take offense and the newsletter does not, by any stretch of the imagination, cast any "official" stance or declaration about the value or worth of the GA project. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 21:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]