Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconIslam Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archive[edit]

How about we turn the ended afd's from the current transclusion to a link, and then archive them when the list gets to long? Seems contrary to the history preservation nature of wikipedia to simply deleted them. --Striver 22:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a need to archive entries in the deletion sorting lists? The way I see it, these projects are there to facilitate input into AfDs and there is no need to archive them since the archive of the AfD themselves are preserved. It just adds more work to maintain the list. → AA (talk) — 16:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems there is a bot out there whose job it is to keep these archives. (User:The wubbot) Yahel Guhan 06:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noinclude tag[edit]

Is there a reason why the AfD's from this list are surrounded by <noinclude>? It is keeping the discussions from showing up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Religion, and it seems to have been like that for a while — Frankie (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New CfD[edit]

See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 July 11#Category:New Christians (conversos), proposed renaming of Category:New Christians (conversos) to either: ALT1 Category:New Christians (conversos) to Category:New Christians (moriscos and conversos) or ALT2 Category:New Christians (conversos) to Category:New Christians (Iberia) IZAK (talk) 23:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]