Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Logic articles by quality/4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

There seems a dichotomy of articles written by almost disjoint groups of authors. One group focuses on philosophical concerns and the other on deeply examined pure abstract logical concerns within a highly sophisticated mathematical system. The purpose and domain of examination of these two groups seems to be very different.

However, the structure and consideration of the editorial teams efforts doesn't seem to be reflect these differences.

One can not combine to such dispersant groups or organizations any more than one can ride two horses...except perhaps one can ride two horses, but is it such a good idea to do so as a matter of course? A better approach would to break the list into two independent lists, each with its own independent purpose in relationship to logic.

To put it another way, there is no meaning without context. Perhaps it would be good to make sure the context is correct for each of these domains of concern. 99.60.2.72 (talk) 05:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]