Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Karl Meier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Can you please explain why? User:ProtectWomen is certainly a sock(the first diff shows that). These two users share much common interests; Islamophobia, Criticism of Islam... --Aminz 05:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So do you, and perhaps Kirbytime, ALM, Itaqallah and a few other editors. Unfortunately for you, you'll have to present evidence before making accusations and wasting peoples time with them on public forums such as this one. Request for checkuser is not for fishing. -- Karl Meier 05:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked Jpgordon to share with us his reasoning. You've already stated your position and so did I (e.g we have a new editor who is clearly a sockpuppet of someone(as shown by the first edit); an editor who only edits certain articles- the rest is based upon feelings and conjectures which at least 2 editors share). Please let Jpgordon to share with us what he thinks. --Aminz 06:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Insufficient grounds, and it really does feel like harassment. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 19:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Jpgordon, thank you and I echo your sentiments. This does feel like harassment to me and it doesn't feel good to be on the receiving end of it. I placed a comment on Aminz's talk page [1] which should be read by all users interested in this request. Also I will do a huge favor for this user and "reveal" my "sock" so that a non-admin checkuser can be performed by said user. Karl states on his webpage "Please note, my IP address is 85.81.20.149. So if I haven't logged in, or if FireFox has logged me out again for some reason, then that's me." I've had a similar problem happen to me and you can find "my sockpuppet" right here: [2]. If you want to know about my motivations for editing Wikipedia you can find it here: my first edit was intended for Muhammad. Aminz, any more problems, please contact me on my user page. I had a similar problem once with Itaqallah for going behind my back, but found this user to be very amicable and apologetic. Even though Itaqallah and I disagree on some points of Islam, I have to say I respect him very much for his civility.--ProtectWomen 19:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As long as your user page stay the way it is. I cannot believe a word your have said. --- ALM 20:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Take it elsewhere. Clerks, please remove the threaded conversation to the talk page. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]