Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Vision Thing

Statement by Vassyana

I am not directly involved in the conflict, but I have reviewed the behaviour of Infinity0 and Vision Thing and given them warnings in the past. Both editors have been blocked for edit warring.[1][2] Please note this. Relevant discussion can also be found here and here. Vassyana 14:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

evidence page

The evidence page includes this statement from User:Full Shunyata: "Keep in mind that Intangible is another anarcho-capitalist editor who is suspected of being a sockpuppet due to his aggressive and POV-style editing and personal vendetta against social anarchists."[3] Are these kind of rash statements even allowed? Intangible2.0 16:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't see why not, and what he says is not completely false, you had edit-warred with User:AaronS and a few others. Might I remind you of Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Intangible, before you get all indignant and self-righteous. -- infinity0 22:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Full Shunyata is fine to keep that statement. FS is stating a deduction or theory that he has provided evidence for. It is suitable to stay. Cbrown1023 talk 01:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Of whom am I a sockpuppet of then? User:Full Shunyata should follow Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets policy instead of making accusations not backed by evidence. Intangible2.0 16:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Please assume that the arbitrators will read both the assumptions and the evidence. I have no opinion on his assumption itself, but the fact stands that he is allowed to make it and state it on the page. Cbrown1023 talk 19:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)