Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Tobias Conradi/Evidence
Evidence from Lar
[edit]I am not done giving evidence, I have a lot more I COULD add... ran out of time and realised maybe i was going into TOO much depth on one particular item. Sorry if this has introduced delay. ++Lar: t/c 14:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Evidence from ShivaIdol
[edit]Controversial moves without first seeking consensus
[edit]any evidence that the >100 were controversial? if not, maybe remove or better mark as uncontroversial Best of all would be full move statistics. Including whether the pages are now under the name where Tobias moved them (possible indicator that the move goal was "good"). Then also please show how one can determine in advance whether a move becomes controversial afterwards. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Tired users
[edit]mentions that the following users are tired
- User:Nichalp
- User:Abecedare
- User:John Reid
- User:Merbabu
- User:Caniago
- User:William Allen Simpson
- User:Evertype
- User:Bluemoose
- User:Golbez
- User:Angela
- User:EdJohnston
maybe they could come to this RfA and present their reasons for tiredness. The quotes ShivaIdol gave do not really help. E.g. "John Reid" says "I do not like whitchhunts, but ... invite me". Also the statements are from the past, maybe the persons in question are not tired anymore because their reasons for being tired do currently not exist (change in view on the world, or changes of the world, ... whatever). Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)