Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2/Evidence

I can hardly give new evidence because very little has changed and little has happened. Andries 05:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that SSS108's digressions on the off-Wikipedia behavior of Reinier van der Sandt who did not make serious contributions to the set of Sathya Sai Baba articles in Wikipedia is off-topic. I also have strong doubts whether SSS108 correctly attributes internet pen names to Reinier van der Sandt. I do not know the pen names of Reinier van der Sandt nor have I studied the evidence in detail and I have no intention to do so. Andries 16:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC) amended Andries 17:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To the contrary, you brought Reinier van der Sandt into the fray my mentioning his name on the evidence page[1]. Reinier van der Sandt even created a user-page on Wikipedia promoting his Anti-Sai website. Therefore, I addressed the fact that he is a critic and has a POV and COI and made my case toward that end.

What is amusing about your comments is that you express doubt about the usernames attributed to Reinier van der Sandt (most of which he admitted using himself), yet then you say that you have not "studied the evidence in detail and have no intention to do so". Enough said. SSS108 ^talk-email 17:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It takes a lot of time to study the evidence and I had hardly followed it and I think that is hardly relevant for the dispute about the set of Wikipedia articles on Wikipedia. Andries 18:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]