Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM

Watch out that Lukas/Thulean

Whatever the defects of LSLM, that he has them, the main and only problem here is that wikilawyering/harasser element Thulean/Lukas19. Since he arrived to Wikipedia a few months ago he's just attacked with all tools at hand (capriciously selected policy, ANI and indiscriminate warnings in user pages). The attitude of administrators and arbitrators, more worried about "civility" than about NPOV and harassment through wikilawyering doesn't help at all.

If Thulean keeps being rewarded (i.e. the ones who oppose his arbitrarity and POV being punished for nuisances) he and the ones like him will take over the project.

In fact, he and his harassment (and the disregard that administrators and ArbCom have displayed in this issue) is the reason that I'm leaving the project.

As I am leaving it (in fact I haven't made any edit in months, mostly because of the lack of trust in the project this element Thulean/Lukas19 and the incomprehensible attitude of many admins in regard to him), I have no problem on breaching the guideline on civility and sya things clear: this guy is a Stormfronter, a neo-nazi, a nordicist racist and he is a very smart one that goes patiently through the mechanisms that wikipolicy and administrators' unwillingness to deal with the real problem allow to not just harass but really smash other editors.

You have to be made of steel (or maybe rubber) to bear such harassment and you have to be blind not to see where the problem really lies. Most admins are blind and most editors are not made up of steel/rubber. I am not definitively and therefore quiting Wikipedia largely because of him (actually because of the complacency and collaboration that wikibureaucracy has displayed towards him and his devious tactics). In this sense, I have no problem about being warned/blocked/whatever for PAs again: because I will not be anymore in Wikipedia actively (unless this element has been supressed like the cancer he is and Wikipedia, i.e. the bureaucracy, has started to see things differently, what sadly is not likely to happen).

I am used to zero tolerance towards intolerance, to zero tolerance towards nazis, neonazis and the like and I really can't understand why Wikipedia's stabilishment (admins) favor these kind of people at all just because they point out others' excesses while we don't even bother in denouncing his.

Good will is penalized and ill will rewarded. In such situation there's no room to work constructively.

When the ill will of Thulean/Lukas19, his devious wikilawyering and personal harassment, his personal and ideological appropiation of articles is finally adressed maybe Wikipedia will become again a place where constructive work can be done and where NPOV articles can be written cooperatively. Meanwhile good bye.

Thulean (Lukas) is the problem here. --Sugaar 11:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Correction:

Someone just made me notice that Lukas19 has been finall banned. Hence please disregard all the above. In fact, after such relieving decission, I will consider seriously returning to the Wiki.

--Sugaar 11:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)