Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Dodger67 2

This is an RfA talk page.

While voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.

Please remain calm and civil in discussions on both pages, avoiding personal attacks and harassment. Uninvolved administrators can still fully intervene in RfAs.
Discussions should stay on-topic; consider moving or continuing discussions that are going off-topic elsewhere.
Move discussions not germane to the candidacy here, then link them with {{subst:rfan|dm|name of section header}}, indented to the original vote. Be conservative in using the template; obvious trolls and disruptive participants need not be noticed.
Otherwise, avoid starting discussions here if they would be of interest to RfA participants and can fit on the main RfA page; generally, discussions should begin at the "General comments" section or as an indented reply to a vote.

Thanks![edit]

First, thanks to my nominators Ritchie333 and Sam Walton, also all the folks who have been ~~nagging~~ pushing me to face the RFA inquisition again. All the participants at my ORCP, thanks to you too.

Thanks to all the !voters, it couldn't happen without you. All those who asked questions; some were tough, some interesting, a few managed to be both; you made me work for this. To my supporters, you folks are such pushovers!<joke/> To the neutrals - your opinions made me think hard. To my opposers, thanks for providing the heat, because as any fule kno an inquisition without fire isn't really worth attending.

Last, but not least, thanks to those who took on the role of janitor to keep the process running smoothly.

Thanks everyone, it's been !fun. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]