Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Norman Cota, Jr.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is not "Original Material", It is obvious that most of the material I gathered on Norman Danial Cota, Jr. were from other reliable sources (ie: Alumni Biography from United States Military Academy, West Point) and the 356th. Fighter Group sites of The USAAF during World War II, and other noted historical material. Just because I am related to the subject by name should not affect this article... if so then may I suggest deleting Maj. Gen. Norman D. Cota as well? To say one is more noted than the other seems discrimatory and bias even to most if not all Wikipedia articles. Please do your homework O.K.?

Aedwardmoch (talk) 02:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)AedwardmochAedwardmoch (talk) 02:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have serious evidence why the deletion should be overturned, take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review. It was deleted not because of any family relationship, but because you didn't provide those sources, despite being aware of the issue and having had plenty of opportunity to do so. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 14:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]