Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MD Rabbi Alam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:22, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MD Rabbi Alam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:POLITICIAN, not having held elective office. Fails WP:BIO, not having been the subject of "published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject". Biruitorul ^Talk 21:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per the nom. But without prejudice to being re-created when just being on the Kansas City Property Maintenance Appeals Board is all you need to have an article as per WP:KANSASCITYPROPERTYMAINTENANCEAPPEALSBOARD. Codf1977 (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN and there is no hint of anything else that would meet notability criteria. Valenciano (talk) 00:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.