Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of expeditions of Muhammad

Sometimes the truth is painful, but it must be told. Keep this article.

I do not agree that the list should be removed. Care should be taken to ensure that the complainants themselves are not biased nor following some idealogical path. Are those citing errors using reliable sources or some airbrushed source? For example, when looking at the life of Mohammed in Medina, is there any reference to the Trench, when Mohammed ordered the mass beheading of 600+ Jews? That is referred to in the revered source Al Tabari. The History of Islam, vol 8 page 35. If it does not, then doubts must be raised. GeorgeBaxter99 (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The truth is not as Orientalists say. Academics like Zafar Ali Qureshi [1] have debunked these wrong ideas spread by Orientalists like Watt. As for the conflict with Banu Qurayza, it is well documented that they violated an agreement between them and the Muslims. They are noted for their treachery during the Battle of Ahzab. Taking the alleged casualty rate, and misunderstand the complexities involved in the conflict indicates a mindset that is prone to bias. Xtremedood (talk) 06:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What you are doing is just censorship. Just because it hurts your feelings can not be reason for delete. no policy exists against hurting muslim feelings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.35.237 (talk) 12:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]