Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jeff Rosenbaum (2nd nomination)

KEEP: In terms of the neopagan community, Mr. Rosenbaum is a promoter on the level of Bill Graham. My friends have been attending the events he promoted for over 20 years. His work has been notable in shaping the consciousness of at least 2 generations of neopagans. Oskar Matz. (talk) 21:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC) — Oskar Matz. (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete Sorry to break protocol here, but after reading all the entries on this nomination, I created this one-time-use account to agree with the nomination to delete this article. If this many editors believe that I'm not notable, then let it go. Perhaps someday, if I publish a book or appear on a couple more CDs or a DVD, or if I'm in the news more, somebody (not me, and I didn't write this one) will write an article that will stand the test. I know a delete vote from me is no more proper than a keep vote, so I'm just posting on the talk page and trying to avoid any further issues of COI here, or connection with any other controversy. But as the subject of the article, I agree that the article as it stands (especially with everything that's been cut out) should be deleted. Feel free to move this entry wherever it works best, or change the "delete" to a "comment", or anything that might correctly modify my faux pas of commenting on an article about me. And Happy New Year to everyone. Jeff Rosenbaum (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rosey, please do move your comment to the page, your opinion is very welcome, it's just if you were to 'vote' for your own article, it would be a bit tragic, but if you actually want the article deleted, wiki often goes with the subject's wish. And happy new year! :) Merkinsmum 20:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff, what are you doing? Everyone already knows Rosencomet/Rosenbaum (you) are the same person. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 23:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]