Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Candidates/SirFozzie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing a candidate for election to the Arbitration Committee.


First post!! (but seriously, can anyone tell me why he shouldn't be re-elected?)[edit]

Is SirFozzie unique in having run in the 3 arbcom elections in a row? Regardless, his contributions as an ARB have always struck me as both thoughtful, incisive and imbued with a deep appreciation for the culture of wikipedia. Asking here incase in my wanderings I have missed something that casts doubt on his re-election, but I have seen nothing that would suggest he is anything other than eminently qualified for re-election. Ajbpearce (talk) 21:56, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shell Kinney, another sitting arb who's term expires in December, has run in the last four elections (see here); I'm not sure if he's running again. And I supported SF last year, and will likely do the same again. DC TC 22:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shell is a 'she' ;-) Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 19:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I supported SirFozzie last year. I cannot say I'm satisfied with the way he communicate. I don't mind if an arb member is more in the strict side as far as voting goes. What I mind much is an arb member who likes to give orders and issue threats to fellow editors. I've seen SirFozzie using different formulas of the statement "I do NOT want to see ... again". I prefer someone who communicate like Newyorkbrad does. Sole Soul (talk) 23:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]