Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/DangerousPanda/Evidence/RFCU
Per DangerousPanda's comment I have removed unnecessary references to his prior username and, to the best of my knowledge, all visible references. NE Ent 20:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you Ent. Drmies (talk) 18:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Your proposal seems a bit misleading. Are you concerned for his safety? Or are you agreeing with NE Ent's premise? If you just think he should because of safety, the time to tell him isn't at an RFC/U regarding his behavior, and the mildness of the proposal appears deceiving. I don't think you would do this on purpose, you seem pretty level headed (even if we disagree) but some clarity might be helpful as you are mixing two issues into one. Dennis 2¢ 23:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm concerned about DP & his family's safety. GoodDay (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I kind of thought that, but perhaps an RFC/U where someone is trying to get him stripped of his admin bit is the wrong venue, that is more about talk page. We aren't here to tell him what he should do for his own safety, that gets pretty personal. The premise of the RFC/U is "DP is so bad, he should drop his admin bit". I disagree, but it looks like you agree by virtue of your post. Of course, if you do think this, that is your right to say, but if the only reason is safety, this is the wrong venue and a bit unfair to him. Dennis 2¢ 23:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- The RfC/U process is non-binding, so he has no risk of losing the bit here. Rationalobserver (talk) 23:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I kind of thought that, but perhaps an RFC/U where someone is trying to get him stripped of his admin bit is the wrong venue, that is more about talk page. We aren't here to tell him what he should do for his own safety, that gets pretty personal. The premise of the RFC/U is "DP is so bad, he should drop his admin bit". I disagree, but it looks like you agree by virtue of your post. Of course, if you do think this, that is your right to say, but if the only reason is safety, this is the wrong venue and a bit unfair to him. Dennis 2¢ 23:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn my view, in accordance with Rfc/U premise. GoodDay (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Nice work, Dennis! Rationalobserver (talk) 23:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Just an observation, I wanted to make sure he was sending the message he really wanted to send. Again, if anyone thinks DP should drop the bit for his actions, by all means, they have the right to express it. Dennis 2¢ 23:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Nice work, Dennis! Rationalobserver (talk) 23:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn my view, in accordance with Rfc/U premise. GoodDay (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- DP speaks bluntly. Nothing wrong with that. Far better than the prissy San Francisco language we see far too much of. Eric Corbett 23:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's quite alright Rationalobserver. I appreciate Dennis' notification & clarification request. PS: I've been through a Rfc of my own & they're not fun. GoodDay (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)