Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Featured log

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured content:

Good content:

Featured and good topic tools:

"WP:FTL" redirects here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Follow the leader.

This is a log of good topics and featured topics from Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates. Discussions about unsuccessful nominations are located in the failed log. Automatic promotions/demotions from good topics to featured topics/featured topics to good topics are not logged.

Candidacy discussion about topics promoted in this calendar month is being placed at Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Featured log/May 2024.

Full current month log

Featured topic candidates: view - edit - history

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Damita Jo

Damita Jo is the eighth studio album by American singer Janet Jackson. EMI Music Japan released it first in Japan on March 22, 2004. Damita Jo debuted at number two on the US Billboard 200 and was considered a disappointment by the media compared to Jackson's previous efforts. To promote it, three singles were released: "Just a Little While", "I Want You" and "All Nite (Don't Stop)", while "R&B Junkie" was issued as a promotional single. Jackson's performance at the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show prior to the album's release, which ended in Jackson's breast being accidentally exposed by surprise guest Justin Timberlake, had a major effect on the album's commercial performance.

Contributor(s): Alex reach me!

I am nominating this since the lead article was recently promoted to GA. --Alex reach me! 20:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support no dearth of pop albums to become topics, it seems. igordebraga 16:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Great work on this topic. "All Nite (Don't Stop)" to this day is such a banger. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Idiosincrático (talk) 03:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This topic has been Approved for promotion. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work. A bot will promote this topic within one hour. Please double check that {{Featured topic box |title= is exactly what you want the topic name to be, is short, and is unformatted. Aza24 (talk) 02:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done. Promotion completed successfully. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Featured topics/Damita Jo}} to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Good topics. NovemBot (talk) 03:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Emirates Cup

The Emirates Cup is an annual pre-season friendly association football competition hosted by Arsenal F.C. at their home stadium, the Emirates Stadium. Arsenal won the first edition in 2007, which featured Paris Saint-Germain, Valencia and Inter Milan; the two-day tournament brought in 110,000 spectators over the four matches. The tournament has been frequently cancelled and since 2019, the format has moved to a single exhibition friendly match between Arsenal and another team.

Contributor(s): Lemonade51

I am nominating this these articles as I believe together they constitute a complete good topic. This former good topic was delisted in 2020 as the 2019 edition had not reached recognised status in time. However, this article has recently been redirected to the lead article per this discussion, thus restoring the topic. It was also noted here that single-match editions (which has been the format since 2019) were not noteworthy enough to constitute individual articles. --Idiosincrático (talk) 02:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AirshipJungleman29: I too was concerned about this. When the list originally passed as an FL, it was more "list-like" and no concerns were brought up then, nor in the previous GT nom. However, I agree with you and I think it should have an article rating. I'd be happy to nominate it for GA status if you'd be willing to review it? Just to help streamline both the GA and GT noms. It's a pretty straightforward article and should be a quick nomination as the article has already passed an FL nomination. I'll wait for your response before doing so :) Idiosincrático (talk) 07:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'm going to change my stance on this; overtime I think as more editions of the tournament pass, the longer the list will grow. I believe the list will grow disproportionately to the commentary and expand into a more of a 'list-class' article. Thus, I think out of practicality, it should remain a list. I'd like to hear other people's opinion on this, but unless someone opposes the nomination, I will not change anything within the topic nomination. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 17:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No problem with the main article being a list (there are a lot of lists that are FLs with a decent history section.) Complete topic, good work. NapHit (talk) 21:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- Phikia (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per previous consensus: complete with respect to notable articles. The main page being a list makes sense to me. — Bilorv (talk) 17:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Closing with consensus to promote.--NØ 06:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]