Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Little wattlebird on eucalypt.jpg

Reason: It was borderline when it passed and the replacement is better in several respects in my opinion (lighting, cut off bits, detail). I'm doing it this way because three featured pictures in an article is probably a bit much and continual improvement is in the wiki spirit imo.
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Little wattlebird on eucalypt.jpg
Nominator: Noodle snacks (talk)

Delist and Replace — Noodle snacks (talk) 12:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Much better composition. How comes it's not noisy at ISO-1600? --Muhammad(talk) 02:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 450D is quite a lot better in that particular respect it turns out. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:54, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
D & R if it were a new nom I'd definitely have issues with the new version but it is much better than the current FP in terms of clearness and not having the distracting background. Cat-five - talk 06:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
D & R background is less distracting. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 08:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
D & R per above. Elekhh (talk) 12:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 02:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:Anthochaera chrysoptera 4.jpg --upstate NYer 07:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]