Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamla Bhatt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Yomangani ^talk 13:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kamla Bhatt[edit]

Delete - This biography article is unsubstantiated. Ed.del.bs 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Closing admin should note, this account has has 13 edits, all of them votes for the deletions. -- Ganeshk (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article may be slightly overblown, but seems to check out. She works for award-winning and notable publications. Global Voices seems very legit, and she's a major contributor. Are any Indian bloggers going to survive the night un-nominated for deletion? Darkspots 23:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Darkspots 16:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Darkspots Doctor Bruno 23:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Ed.del.bs is a single-purpose account. utcursch | talk 06:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ - Overblown is a milder description! Looks like all these madarasis are having their pals working on their behalf, to make a mountain out of a mole hill. Ed.del.bs 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not anybody's pal, and I don't know bubkes about Indian bloggers. What caught my eye is that you listed three related articles on AfD without properly tagging the articles in question with the afd1 template, which in good faith I assume that you failed to do because you're a new user, not because you wanted to delete articles without letting the editors that work on them know about the deletion discussion. But it had the effect of not letting those editors contribute, so I tagged the articles and took the additional step of publicizing the discussions. Finding enough notability to realize that your assertions about these articles are biased and unfair was only a couple minutes' worth of research. Darkspots 02:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Striking duplicate vote. -- Ganeshk (talk) 02:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - per ed. Please refrain from racist rants, its not "madrasi" its "Tamil"Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baka, I think you meant speedy keep per utcursch. Ed is the one nominating. :) -- Ganeshk (talk) 02:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - I was kidding about that, in the mold of Darkspot above.Bakaman _Bakatalk 05:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-Seems to be notable. Nileena joseph ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 03:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Super Speedy Delete : On the same lines. Sarvagnya 17:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly see my comments: [1] --Bhadani 05:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Darkspots above. Article could do with some cleanup, but is certainly not a candidate for deletion - subject is well known and notable. AfD is not a substitute for editing. Achitnis 17:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Achitnis is right. --Bhadani 05:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.