Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (1st nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to 2006 allegations of corruption in English football. Deathphoenix ʕ 03:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Porritt[edit]

Not a notable player only in the youth team but you can add him when he is part of the first team at Middlesbrough F.C. but not yet.

Keep Article Player is big future prospect and could be called up to first team any time now. Well known in footballing circles before allegations as england youth player Maniacgeorge 17:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and nominate WESTSIDE 16:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since for the moment he is only notable in relation to allegations about the conduct of certain football coaches and scouts, redirect to 2006 allegations of corruption in English football. This does not prejudice against creating a separate article if he becomes a full professional in the future. Qwghlm 16:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Qwghlm 16:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2006 allegations of corruption in English football. Scottmsg 17:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2006 allegations of corruption in English football. Kingjamie 19:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 2006 allegations of corruption in English football, for now. When he becomes a recognised player in his own right, then the article can become about him again. aLii 10:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.