Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comme Chez Soi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ21 06:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comme Chez Soi[edit]
- Comme Chez Soi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film lacking ghit and Gnews of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 04:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Comment: This French language film article will require a MOVE to Comme Chez Soi as the added disambig "(2011)" is not required. It seems to have had wide enough distribution so that I will withhold an opinion until I search for French and Swiss sources discussing this non-English film. Notable to France is perfectly fine for en.Wikipedia. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Keep but only with appropriate references, and amend the second paragraph to conform to NPOV guidelines. I will move the article to a more appropriate title though. Deb (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Have rewritten the synopsis per Deb comment.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 16:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Drew 3.2 million viewers and was considered a successful release when it came out on one of France's three major TV chains in 2011 (http://www.ozap.com/actu/audiences-tf1-et-nrj-12-faibles-france-2-devance-m6-tmc-et-w9-a-un-haut-niveau/437859). Has since received international distribution on a major global chain (TV5). Features notable lead actors. Was featured in the largest French newspaper, Le Figaro, in particular.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 12:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 10:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per User:Truth or consequences-2. smtchahal(talk) 15:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.