Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bless (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominatory and no other meaningful arguments for deletion. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 15:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bless (game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like an advert for the game to me. Seems to have some coverage but not enough. Maybe suitable for Speedy G11 but I am not sure. Tyros1972 Talk 12:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could be notable later, but as is the article is effectively unusable. I agree it needs some meaningful claim to notability which is lacking from the article. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 20:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article is formatted badly, but IGN is certainly a RS in this context and their coverage is non-trivial. Not sure about the other source. But if it's reliable, this meets WP:GNG with the sources in hand. [1] appears to be reliable also. Hobit (talk) 03:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as pointed above IGN is a reliable source, and the game is also among the "Top 12 MMORPGs To Watch Out For In 2013" by Forbes: [2]. Google News archives provide a bunch of news articles and reviews about this game, I doubt they are all unreliable, some of them: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Cavarrone 06:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have cleaned up the text (removing advertising etc) and moved the page to Bless (game). OSborn ^arf_contribs. 23:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw AfD Thanks OSborn it's actually starting to look good. I think this is obviously a keep as IGN as a very reliable source, so I am withdrawing the AfD as keep. If someone would be kind enough to close this. Tyros1972 Talk 23:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.