Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2020/November

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposals, November 2020

Pyraustinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized subfamily, these by genus splits will reduce the size but not quite below the 800 mark:

Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Noctuinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, these should knock it in to shape:

Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Astereae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Newly oversized, the following seems to be the only genus with 60+ articles and will hopefully reduce this for a while

Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Galaxy stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, the following should reduce this back to normal size

Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

British Columbia politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, we have already split out the mayors I propose we next split out the MLA's next as the Unicarmal house of the state parliament

this should take about 600 articles out.Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rapid transit stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, we have a mix of sub categories by system, country and continent I propose the following to tidy up this category at least

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

proteobacteria stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category has two oversized subcats, based on permcats the following are viable

Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Buprestidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category. The following seem viable but may not be enough to reduce it below 800.

Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

North Macedonia geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category, North Macedonia has 80 municipalities split into 8 Statistical Regions. I propose categories for the regions fed by regional and municipalaty templates. Note that I have taken the municipality names from here and taken out spaces, hyphens and in one case the word "and"

Waacstats (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Argentina football midfielder stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category is getting large, so I propose the following speedies:

I see no reason for this not to go ahead. Waacstats (talk) 12:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nigeria geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, we already have by state templates and some categories. I propose a split based on the geopolitical zones of Nigeria as follows:

Waacstats (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Harpalinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized caregory, 1 existing subcat, I propose the following joins it

I have added genus to the category to match the permcat but not to the template as I think the chances of having a stub tag on any specific individual with the name, or the moon crater are rather slim. Waacstats (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

United States judge stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
An oversized category, I propose the following

Waacstats (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American engineer stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, the following are all viable but I don't think they will be enough to reduce it below the 800 mark.

Waacstats (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Plant disease stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, I would like to propose the following split

Waacstats (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scarabaeidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized, no existing subcats, these are all viable categories and should bring it off the oversized list.

Waacstats (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Japanese baseball biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Large category, could be trimmed down with these speedies:

This looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 19:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cornwall geography stubs split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Cornwall is currently governed under a unitary authority; districts were abolished in 2009, but if we're going to divvy up this 1,151-article stub cat, I suggest it be by those former districts. I inquired of the Cornwall portal (discussion here) and this seems feasible to those who know Cornwall. Thus, I'm proposing the following templates, with categories to follow for those used on 60+ articles:

Thoughts? Her Pegship (?) 16:53, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Oops! Thanks for catching that.Her Pegship (?) 19:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pterostichinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, the following all appear to be viable categories

Metius may be a problem as the page Metius redirects to a Dutch geometer, the article is at Metius (beetle) and the Category:Metius (genus), there is also a crater mentioned on the disambiguation page. I can't see us ever having stub categories for any of the other uses so have not disambig the stub category Waacstats (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

If you're in the market for more beetle stub types, see the already-approved templates from 2011 here. Her Pegship (?) 19:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New South Wales geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, a bit of a mess on subcats but I think these fit in and they are viable

Waacstats (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Salticidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, the following is a viable subcat but will not get it below the 800 mark.

Waacstats (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pyramidellidae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized, the following are viable and should reduce the size below 800

Waacstats (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phaegopterina stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, following are viable and will reduce the size but not to 800.

Waacstats (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Actinobacteria stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, the following are viable and should reduce this below 800.

Waacstats (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Moldova geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Moldova geography stubs is oversized, and since none of the template have 60 articles, I propose the following regions based on the map found at Administrative divisions of Moldova:

All looks good to me, it will get another one off the oversized list. Waacstats (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
potential speedy as template has 60 articles and no category of it's own

Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Gecko stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, these will reduce it, but may be not enough to get it off the list:

Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Skink stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, these should reduce it enough to get it off the list:

Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Euchromiina stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, the following are viable but may not get it off the list:

Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Erebinae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cosmopterigidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized. I propose the following setup:

As usual categories only if we get to 60 articles. Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Japanese actors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, only subcat is for voice actors, I propose the following setup to follow other countries

Obviously categories only for those that pass 60.Waacstats (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

both from oversized Category:Olethreutinae stubs, and should get another one off the list. Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Italian politicians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A large, but not quite oversized category Category:Italian politician stubs in need of split before it gets to oversize, a quick look would suggest the following are all viable.

Not 100% sure on names so any assistance. Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Support, provided spelling of "Italy" gets fixed in the templates. ;P Her Pegship (?) 21:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Corrected. Waacstats (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Elachistidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, already has a couple of sub-categories but the following would also be viable and would take over half the articles.

Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ankara Province geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, next split would be by district, based on article names I propose the following templates

with categories for those that pass the 60 mark, along the lines of Category:Foo geography stubs or Category:Foo, Ankara geography stubs depending on the name of the article. Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ghana geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized category, ripe for split by Regions, I therefore propose the following, with the categories for any templates that pass 60.

Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Somme geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized category. French departments are neatly split into arrondissemnts so I propose

to match the split of other departments, obviously categories only if templates pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tuscany geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, Italy helpfully splits its regions up into provinces so I propose the following to match other Italian regions

Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Panama geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category. Panama is split into 10 peovinces and 3 Indigenous Regions so I propose the following

Do we need to set up non accented redirects for those of us not used to dealing with accents. I have also added the country two digit code to the Panama Province template to distinguish it from the Country template. Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes to the question about non-accented redirects, per well-buried discussion and advice from user Grutness. Her Pegship (?) 00:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bacteroidetes stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
category is oversized with the following being viable:

Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bee stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
oversized with the following being viable:

Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Victoria (Australia) geos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, we already have some of the economic regions seen here I propose we finish this off with the following.

Hopefully this will greatly reduce the size of the category. Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Muricidae stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, perm cats are not greatly used but the following are viable.

It looks like the perm cat will need to be sorted as well. Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesostigmata stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category, without a fully developed perm cats (there are more articles in the stub category than in the perm cat and subcats). It does look however that the following are viable

Waacstats (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ryukyu Kingdom stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as RyukyuKingdom-stub.
I’d like to propose a stub category for things related to the Ryukyu Kingdom. Many articles could use it, such as monarchy stubs (ex. Shō Tei, Shō Sen'i, Shō Boku, ), literature stubs (ex. Ryūkyū-koku yurai-ki, Kyūyō, Chūzan Seifu), architecture stubs (ex. Uezu House, Izena Tamaudun) and many more.

Because it’s kind of vague to put all of these articles in a Ryukyu Kingdom stub category, we could separate it by doing things like this:

  • Ryukyuan history stubs
  • Ryukyuan literature stubs
  • Ryukyuan royalty stubs
  • Ryukyuan religion stubs
  • Ryukyuan architecture stubs

I think this would work well and give many articles a more specific stub category. Anyway, thank you for reading my proposal. — Haimounten (talk) 03:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

  • Given that Category:Ryukyu Kingdom and it's sub categories only have 256 articles in total, many of which are not stubs I would not feel comfortable having the 5 mentioned categories plus I assume a parent category. I think at most we would be looking at a Category:Ryukyu Kingdom stubs and maybe a Category:Ryukyu Kingdom biography stubs. There does not appear to be any permanent categories for Ryukyuan history/literature/religion or architecture at the moment and I think those should come before a stub category for them. Waacstats (talk) 07:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
That's a fair point. I mainly wanted a single Ryukyu Kingdom-stub to begin with but I thought some people would strike it down for being too "vague". I'm glad to hear other people's opinion. — Haimounten (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Ditto what Waacstats said. Would that be {{RyukuKingdom-stub}}? Her Pegship (?) 19:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Well, yes, although “Ryuku” is actually “Ryukyu”. Thank you for joining in the discussion. — Haimounten (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Per consensus from both Waacstats and Her Pegship, I will change my proposal to instead create a single Ryukyu Kingdom stub. — Haimounten (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Eek. Sorry - should be {{RyukyuKingdom-stub}} then, right? Her Pegship (?) 21:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes, that would be correct. Sorry for the late response. — Haimounten (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2020/November&oldid=1001267805"