Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Fountain of Time

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fountain of Time[edit]

Passed --Eurocopter (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator(s): TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because I hope that WP:MILHIST values articles on peace memorials and can lend constructive criticism for this article.TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Query - how does this fall in our scope? :/ —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 05:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm guessing that the idea here is that it's effectively a memorial to commemorate a peace treaty. I'd think that probably qualifies, since we include normal war memorials as a matter of course. Kirill ^[pf] 05:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
QUERY Does anyone know of a category for memorials, sculptures or fountains that pay tribute to peace.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wandalstouring (talk) 12:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support This meets the A-class criteria. I do have some comments you might wish to consider though:
- The article's text is clear, but a bit choppy.
- The use of phrases such as "Some view" is discouraged as they're a form of weasel words
  - Rephrased.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Gallery' sections are discouraged by MOS:IMAGES and WP:IG and the current gallery would be better placed on Wikicommons. Nick-D (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Galleries are not discouraged per se by WP:IG (MOS:IMAGES simply references WP:IG), but I'm not sure that this gallery really adds anything to the article. If there is a desire to keep the gallery, then at a minimum I would look to improve it as per WP:IG - as it exists now, a gallery that simply shows the subject from different angles is something that should really be moved to the Commons. Perhaps use the gallery to identify a number of the figures in the sculpture (and change the heading accordingly to something more descriptive). --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'Comments' (little stuff) Support
"Benjamin Ferguson's 1905 US$1 million charitable trust gift to "memorialize events..."

Not so sure about the link to US$, is it really necessary?

I piped it so it is just a $ sign.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K., works for me. Changing vote to support.

"Designed without expansion joints, few outdoor sculptures have been made of similar materials since the 1930s ..." (section: Restoration)

The fountain was designed w/o expansion joints? Maybe it's just me (maybe go to sleep and come back in a couple hours?), but it's very difficult to understand this sentence.

I tried to address this complaint.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, pls reply to first comment.

A nicely written article. Icy // ♫ 20:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.