Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Virginia State Route 37

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Virginia State Route 37[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Virginia State Route 37 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
Nominator's comments: I think this article is ready to take the next step, as it is already a GA., and I think it meets the criteria.
Nominated by: Philroc (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
First comment occurred: 16:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


  • @Philroc: you have made no edits to this article. Please explain why you have nominated this article despite not contributing to it at all. NE2 appears to be the major contributor to the article. --AdmrBoltz 16:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Aside from the nominator not even having edited the article, the Future section is entirely unsourced. It's also a bit short for an A-Class article, in my opinion. TCN7JM 16:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for not making any edits to the article prior to nomination. –Fredddie 17:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the above, and this is now ready for speedy close. --Rschen7754 18:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing note: it is an unwritten rule that nominators are supposed to be familiar with the article and its sources to deal with any review comments that are the result of the ACR. For that reason, reviewers have opposed and this ACR is being closed. It is also worth mentioning that the Future section is before the History section in the article. That means events to come are before events that have happened, disorganizing the article. Imzadi 1979  20:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.