Wikipedia:WikiProject Geology/Meteorites
This task force is believed to be inactive. Consider looking for related projects for help or ask at the Teahouse.
If you are not currently a project participant and wish to help you may still participate in the project or its parent project WikiProject Geology. This status should be changed if collaborative activity resumes. |
WikiProject Geology |
---|
Organization |
Participants |
Open tasks |
Assessment |
Resources |
Showcase |
Earth sciences portal |
The Meteorites task force is a group of editors who aim to improve Wikipedia's articles about Meteorites as part of WikiProject Geology and WikiProject Astronomy.
The articles in Category:Meteorites and its sub-categories have tended to be overlooked, falling as they do between geology and astronomy; the existence of this task force will keep them in view and help prevent future neglect.
Goals
[edit]To bring each of Wikipedia's articles on meteorites to at least "B-class", comprehensively covering all major aspects of the subject.
Achievements
[edit]Featured article
[edit]DYK
[edit]- European Fireball Network - 8. June 2010 (1695 views)
- IVB meteorite - 4. January 2013 (4882 views)
- Zakłodzie meteorite - 5. January 2013 (1904 views)
- Nonmagmatic meteorite - 7. January 2013 (489 views)
- Itqiy meteorite - 9. January 2013 (2132 views)
- Northwest Africa 7034 - 11. January 2013 (10439 views)
- Mundrabilla (meteorite) - 17. January 2013 (3245 views)
- IIAB meteorites - 20. January 2013 (1614 views)
- Micrometeorite - 24. February 2013 (2101 views)
- Allan Hills A81005 - 3. March 2013 (5105 views)
Article alerts
[edit]I added some information on the Guffey ungrouped iron meteorite (possible ataxite) to the Guffey, Colorado article. I don't know if this meteorite is notable enough to deserve its own article. It is the largest meteorite ever recovered in the US state of Colorado. I'm not particularly knowledgeable about meteorites, so I thought I would note it here and let someone run with it, if they chose. GeoGreg (talk) 17:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I've been working on the Polonnaruwa (meteorite) article for a while, but it is not yet clear if the object is actually a meteorite. Additional expertise would be great. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Focus for the month
[edit]- January 2013 - Create articles (or link to subsections of existing articles) for as many red links as possible, especially in the templates. List here.
- December 2012 - WikiProject Geology's December collaboration was: improve articles in Category:Meteorites and its sub-categories.
Approach
[edit]Articles should present the subject in a way that is easy for a complete newcomer to understand, while retaining informative content to engage the more advanced reader. The usual Wikipedia standards apply:
Naming conventions
[edit]In work. See discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geology/Meteorites#Naming_convention_question.
Recommended meteorite classification scheme
[edit]Meteorite classification is a complex subject with a long history. Long story short, we need to choose one scheme and use it consistently across all articles, infoboxes and navboxes in the projects scope.
The recommended scheme is:
- Based on Weisberg, McCoy, Krot 2006:
- M. K. Weisberg; T. J. McCoy; A. N. Krot (2006). "Systematics and Evaluation of Meteorite Classification". In D. S. Lauretta; H. Y. McSween, Jr. (eds.). Meteorites and the early solar system II (PDF). Tucson: University of Arizona Press. pp. 19–52. ISBN 978-0816525621. Retrieved 15 December 2012.
- With additions of:
- For the newly accepted IIG irons see:
- Wasson, John T.; Choe, Won-Hie (31 July 2009). "The IIG iron meteorites: Probable formation in the IIAB core" (PDF). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 73 (16): 4879–4890. Bibcode:2009GeCoA..73.4879W. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2009.05.062.
- For IIF irons see:
- Kracher, Alfred; Willis, John; Wasson, John T (31 May 1980). "Chemical classification of iron meteorites—IX. A new group (IIF), revision of IAB and IIICD, and data on 57 additional irons". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 44 (6): 773–787. Bibcode:1980GeCoA..44..773K. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(80)90259-8.
- For the new views on enstatite achondrites see:
- Keil, Klaus (31 December 2009). "Enstatite achondrite meteorites (aubrites) and the histories of their asteroidal parent bodies". Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry. 70 (4): 295–317. doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2010.02.002.
Please familiarise yourself with it and use it whenever you edit one of "our" articles.
Task list / Worklist
[edit]You are welcome to tackle all or part of any of these; don't wait to be asked or granted permission.
Delete tasks you complete by editing the box below.
Notes
[edit]- Stubs
The list of stubs is at Category:Meteorite stubs. A few remain in Category:Meteoroid stubs awaiting transfer by a bot in the new year. Only articles about objects which have impacted a planet are "ours"; objects still in the heavens are the responsibility of WikiProject Astronomy.
- Commons
Work through Category:Meteorites on Wikimedia Commons looking for:
- Illustrations for the 74 meteorite articles which lack them; see Category:Meteorite articles without images
- Potential new meteorite articles or links to existing ones we don't yet know about
- Potential new cultural item articles or links to existing ones we don't yet know about
- Potential new meteorite people articles or links to existing ones we don't yet know about
- Potential new strewn field articles (there are at least half a dozen strewn field maps scattered on there) or links to existing ones we don't yet know about
- Anything else that pops out
- Bot
Shepherd to completion the bot task listed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geology#Wikipedia:Bot_requests.23Meteorites.
Article assessment
[edit]Importance
[edit]Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total |
2 | 41 | 71 | 240 | 129 | 17 | 500 |
This section describes a semi-automated way to determine the importance of each of "our" articles.
Using the Wikipedia Release Version tools on the Wikimedia Toolserver it is a simple task to generate a list of all articles in a Category sorted in any of several ways. To assess importance we sort by release version score, the last column in the toolserver generated lists (described here).
The following table gives a link to such a list for each Category of interest and the range of scores for articles of each importance value within that category. Before using the links, force an update of the toolserver data using the instructions at User:SelectionBot/Web/Guide#Update project data.
It may occasionally be necessary to adjust the ranges in the table so that breaks fall at reasonable places in the lists.
Category | Low | Medium | High | Top | Last checked |
Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meteorites (15) | - | - | - | All | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorites by name (0) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite minerals (54) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
People associated with meteorites (0) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite organisations (0) | 0-399 | 400-699 | 700 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteoritics publications (3) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite prizes (8) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite subdivisions (1) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | OK | |
Meteorite types (5) | - | - | All | - | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite clans (5) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite classes (7) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | Review with User:Tobias1984 |
Meteorite groups (22) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | Check again in a week |
Meteorite subgroups (0) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite grouplets (1) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | Review with User:Tobias1984 |
Meteorite structural classes (3) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite mineralogy & petrology (16) | 0-299 | 300-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite falls (116) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorite hunting (3) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Strewn field (meteorite) (40) | 0-499 | 500-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Meteorites in culture (10) | 0-299 | 300-899 | 900 and above | None | 2013-01-04 | OK |
Note: If a particular article does not appear in one of the lists then check that it has "our" project banner on its talk page and is included in the list's category. Only articles with both these attributes correctly set will be listed. Articles may take a few hours to appear on the lists when newly assessed, reassessed, categorised or recategorised.
Quality (Class)
[edit]FA | A | GA | B | C | Start | Stub | FL | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | File | Portal | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? | Total |
0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 62 | 176 | 96 | 0 | 16 | 107 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 500 |
We are aiming for all our articles to be "B-Class" or higher. According to Wikipedia:Version 1.0_Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria#Proposed quality standards this means that they are expected to be reasonably satisfactory for an ordinary reader. The following are minimum guidelines.
In no particular order, articles should:
- be neutral point-of-view,
- be reasonably clear,
- be organized adequately,
- have no known factual errors,
- have appropriate categorization,
- be adequate in scope and proportion,
- use style consistently within the article,
- be visually adequate (that is, not ugly),
- use correct grammar, spelling and punctuation,
- list at least one appropriate reference, source, further information item, or external link. A link fulfills this obligation only if it connects to a reputable source. Government, professional or education sites are reputable for this purpose. Any external links must also still be valid (that is, still connect to the intended material).
- Pictures are recommended but normally not required. Exceptions may be made where especially relevant.
Participation
[edit]Everyone is encouraged to help with the tasks listed above. You may also wish to add this page to your watchlist to keep an eye on developments.
Anyone wishing to formally indicate their membership of the project should add their signature to the list below:
- -Arb. (talk) 00:00, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Tobias1984 (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- Basilicofresco (msg) 14:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Resources
[edit]List here any generally useful resources that could be accessed when working on meteorite articles.
Notability guidelines
[edit]These are guidelines for notability of Meteoritics-related topics.
The general Wikipedia guidelines apply (and are well worth reading):
- Meteorites
The following are likely to meet notability requirements:
- Classification:
- Type specimen of a group (e.g. Brachinite and Brachina meteorite)
- Type specimen of a grouplet (e.g. Bellsbank meteorite, former Bellsbank Trio)
- Regional
- Largest meteorite(s) of a country
- Discovery
- Observed falls
- Exceptional stories of discovery (e.g. hit a house/car/dog)
- Scientific
- Really special chemistry/mineralogy highlighted in a scientific journal (name of meteorite in title would be ideal)
- Meteorites found by Apollo program and any of the rover programs (e.g. Heat Shield Rock); this is effectively all meteorites found on extraterrestrial bodies as there is still a very small number of them - see Category:Meteorites found on bodies other than Earth
- Meteoriticists
Templates
[edit]Project banner
[edit]Place {{WikiProject Geology|class=|importance=|meteorite=Yes|meteorite-importance=}}
onto any new article's talk page for it to be recognised and assessed by this task force.
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters and helps organise relevant articles for improvement.
When assessed, the class and importance parameters are filled in, like this:
{{WikiProject Geology|class=Start|importance=Mid|meteorite=yes|meteorite-importance=High}}
and the banner looks like this:
Geology: Meteorites Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Shortcuts: {{WikiProject Geology}}, {{WPGEOLOGY}}, {{WPGeology}}, {{WP Geology}}
The article is classified in the appropriate subcategories of Category:Meteorites.
For more information visit the WikiProject Geology assessment page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Geology/Assessment
Infobox meteorite
[edit]Place {{Infobox meteorite}} at the top of any article about a specific meteorite. Instructions for completing its fields are at Template:Infobox meteorite.
Infobox meteorite subdivison
[edit]Place {{Infobox meteorite subdivision}} at the top of any article about meteorite subdivisions (e.g. group, class, etc...) Template:Infobox meteorite subdivision.
Infobox mineral
[edit]Place {{Infobox mineral}} at the top of any article about a specific mineral. Instructions for completing its fields are at Template:Infobox mineral.
Infobox rock
[edit]Place {{Infobox rock}} at the top of any article about a specific rock type (not mineral) found within one or more meteorites. Instructions for completing its fields are at Template:Infobox rock.
Infobox person
[edit]Place {{Infobox person}} at the top of any article about a specific meteorite related person. Instructions for completing its fields are at Template:Infobox person.
- Or: {{Infobox scientist}} for Meteoriticists.
Infobox organization
[edit]Place {{Infobox organization}} at the top of any article about a specific meteorite related organization. Instructions for completing its fields are at Template:Infobox organization.
Infobox journal
[edit]Place {{Infobox journal}} at the top of any article about a specific meteorite related journal. Instructions for completing its fields are at Template:Infobox journal.
Infobox award
[edit]Place {{Infobox award}} at the top of any article about a specific meteorite related prize or award. Instructions for completing its fields are at Template:Infobox award.
Meteorite-stub
[edit]Place {{Meteorite-stub}} at the bottom of stub articles. It should look like this:
Meteorites Navbox
[edit]Place {{Meteorites}} at the bottom of all meteorite articles. It should look like this: