Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeta Alpha II

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (no consensus). --Ryan Delaney ^talk 08:21, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Alpha II

Delete non-notable fancruft Soltak 00:17, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable fictional entity, like so many on Vfd recently. Kappa 00:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- So as to avoid debating this topic, I direct everyone to User:Soltak/Views#Fancruft Soltak 00:24, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge it's not notable, it's a trivial detail about the episode The Best of Both Worlds (TNG episode). There is no room for expansion or improvement of this single-sentence article. unsigned comment by User:Ben-w
Merge to the episode article, per unsigned previous comment by user User:Ben-w. WP:FICT. Barno 00:58, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable fictional entry, especially considering it pretains to the Borg incident on Star Trek.Gateman1997 01:38, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to episode. One sentence isn't enough to merit its own article. Fernando Rizo T/C 01:46, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Soltak, or at worst Merge. Nandesuka 02:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Key episode, but not a significant detail. I don't see how merging it will improve the BoBW articl. ManoaChild 02:11, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with episode that relates to this entry. Hamster Sandwich 03:23, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. per above mergers/mergists/mergerists. →ubεr nεmo→ ^lóquï 03:42, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. A planet mentioned in passing, whose only claim to fame is being the launching point of a ship never seen on screen? How is this possibly encyclopedic? - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 05:00, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Period. NOthing to merge, nothing worth merging. Even Star Trek fans would find this crufty to the max, and calling it "notable" means that someone is sorely in need of a dictionary. --Calton | Talk 05:14, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
Merge with the appropriate episode, per Barno and WP:FICT. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:07, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As per motivation in the nomination. / Peter ^Isotalo 11:45, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
A reluctant delete. jamesgibbon 13:51, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Best of Both Worlds (TNG episode). Proto t c 15:19, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Same reason as Calton, except my explanation uses the word "life" instead of "dictionary". SchmuckyTheCat 16:16, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's try to stay civil here, ok? / Peter ^Isotalo 16:46, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't there some list of planets in Star Trek, like there is for Star Wars? If so merge there, if not delete. -R. fiend 16:40, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Either delete or merge with the as-yet non-existent Places in the Star Trek Universe. JDoorjam 20:32, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into List of Star Trek: The Next Generation planets (create actually) 132.205.95.43 23:19, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn star trek cruft. Memory Alpha's entry has barely more on it. --Etacar11 23:58, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the episode, and to List of Star Trek planets or equivalent. ~~ N (t/c) 07:03, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete or merge non-notable and trivial. Aepva 15:27, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.