Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wind-up Willy on Wheels

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:06, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wind-up Willy on Wheels

This appears never to have been listed. --Dmcdevit·t 07:24, July 19, 2005 (UTC)

The "sex toy" described is obscure, despite the article's claim that it is "popular", and the self-reference to Wikipedia vandal Willy on wheels is unacceptable. Besides, this page was created by User:Windupremisonwheels, whose contributions and user page strongly indicate that he has created this solely for disruption purposes. Phils 23:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Vandal-like page. --Habap 23:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I think that is rather unfair. I am merely a fan of the gentleman, rather than a sockpuppet, and believe that the article should exist, though it definitely needs cleaning and expanding etc. I myself am certainly not a vandal, so if you do choose to delete this article, I shan't complain.--Windupremisonwheels 23:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- A fan of a vandal? Heresy, best keep that to yourself. I almost blocked you for your username without even checking who you are. Perhaps I should have. This link is Broken 04:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete Never heard of the damned thing except in the context of the vandal, who should not be encouraged in any way. -- Arwel 23:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- It is real and be yours for $4.99 (+shipping) from [1] but of course …

Speedily to BJAODN as a record of where the vandal got his name from. -- RHaworth 03:17, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)

Delete - More Willy on Wheels sillyness. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 23:16, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Well, Wikipedia:Avoid self-references. We are definitely not going to have an article on Willy, who is not notable outside Wikipedia. The sex toy is too obscure to have its own article, if we can't say anything more than "it's a sex toy". JRM · Talk 23:45, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
On revisiting, if it matters: this is actually a gag present, not a sex toy. At least I wouldn't imagine it being used as such... comfortably. JRM · Talk 02:07, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
'Delete no more trophies for the vandal. This link is Broken 04:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Exterminate!, blank, lock. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 14:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
'Delete. CDThieme 02:28, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Remember to delete Image:Bachelorette-dot-com 1851 34381307.jpg at the same time. -- Infrogmation July 1, 2005 06:02 (UTC)
Delete. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 07:53, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 09:31, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:18, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete and give User:Windupremisonwheels a permanent block (he has Nazi and Ku Klux Klan propaganda on his user page in addition to the picture of this "toy". --Idont Havaname 22:28, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
BJAODN --Carnildo 22:39, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NN, D. ComCat 22:45, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn. Pavel Vozenilek 00:11, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete don't BJAODN it just encourages this silliness -- Francs2000 | Talk 15:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and place a hard-ban on everyone associated with this "willy" vandalism. Binadot 17:10, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.