Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wangus

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus, kept. Hedley 01:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wangus

Delete, none of the Google hits have any more meaning than this article does. And I googled for "Wangus Meat" in case it was supposed to be a band or a brand, but got zero hits. -Splash 03:23, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no-no, I think it's something much simpler than that. ~~Delete~~--DNicholls 03:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I'd feel a lot better about it if a Google search for wangus beef contained less comical results...--DNicholls 18:58, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. BJAODN? Aerion //talk 03:40, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nn --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 04:08, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wangus meat is probably much like spam. Denni☯ 04:33, 2005 July 24 (UTC)
- Maybe, but having a name that contains wang can't be good. Not that a bowlful of minced cow phalluses would be any more repulsive than spam... Garrett^Talk 13:30, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - See Rocky Mountain Oyster and judge for yourself. Meelar (talk) 14:51, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
    - Hm, I have heard of similar (I do live in New Sheepland y'see) but I'd say that's slightly less gross... just a smidge... :) Garrett^Talk 09:11, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although I have heard that once you eat a wangus, you'll always be a wangus eater. Hamster Sandwich 05:52, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, but not BJAODN-worthy either. Unless the ingredients are as I described above... Weak keep, now we know what it is. Garrett^Talk 04:14, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: This from Google: beef cows ... Wagyu is a Japanese breed, and Wangus is a Wagyu and Angus cross. So Wangus is an obscure hybrid like a Liger or Tigron. And not as dirty as I thought. :) I doubt this breed is noteworthy enough thouhgGarrett^Talk 13:35, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I've rewritten the article in line with Garrett's findings. It's only a stub, but it's better than it was. It's probably not that notable, but I think it just about scrapes in. KeithD 18:43, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge into some other cow article. Wikipedia should definitely contain informative obscure (sourced) facts such as these. L upin 11:40, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep with rewrite. JamesBurns 06:47, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.