Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pull (physics)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - renamed and kept - SimonP 19:29, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Pull (physics)

dicdef, Wikitionaryise Alai 00:24, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Redirect harmlessly to force. One of the first definitions a physics student sees for force is "a push or a pull." --1pezguy 03:13, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

But there are so many other meanings to the word "pull". Kelly Martin 03:54, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

The only meaning that's encyclopedic is force. But that's being difficult just for the purpose of being difficult. --1pezguy 04:13, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

It also has a meaning in computer science. The assembly commands for dealing with the stack (computing) are often pull and push, although "pop" is used more often instead of pull. Grue 05:48, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete. It doesn't matter how many dictionary definitions it has, they all belong in Wiktionary. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Disambig between Stack (computing), force, should also be in pickup but unfortunately that redirects to seduction. Kappa 10:18, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, in Stack (computing), the opposite of 'push' is 'pop'. So I'd say redirect to force. R adiant _* 13:51, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Moved to Pull (physics), but should still be disambiged. Denni☯ 03:06, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
- But you didn't up-date this page... tsk, tsk. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:59, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  - OK, it's done. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:00, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.