Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip tiberius naess gross
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Philip tiberius naess gross[edit]
Non-encyclopaedic and non-notable Dave.Dunford 02:31, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless references are provided. I can't verify that this person exists. Pburka 03:54, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Probable hoax. Google has nothing, which is unfathomable for a model. -- BD2412 talk 04:33, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non-encyclopedic, unverified, age 13
- Comment -- improvement and NPOV tags needed, no vote -- can't verify notability, but if person has worked for major labels and appeared in major media, well, maybe. Some 13-year-old models may actually be notable no doubt. DavidH 05:45, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Another obvious delete.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 08:16:05, 2005-08-08 (UTC)
- Delete. 0 (ZERO) google hitz --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 10:35, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Corrected typos, made NPOV. Voyager640 15:49, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - If he's not showing up on Google, he's most certainly not the next "Brad Pitt." There is a remote chance that the author misspelled his name, I suppose, but I highly doubt it.--Frag 20:54, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn/unverified. --Etacar11 23:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.