Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontological guilt

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 16:51, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

Ontological guilt

Unsavable original research and amazingly POV. A few days ago, I deleted an obnoxious picture gallery that consisted of images of George W. Bush, Hitler, and the Holocaust (and I'm a solid Democrat, by the way). This article is the first of the 174 Google hits on "ontological guilt". Article is the sole contribution of User:Delita Figaro, who has not returned to defend her work. --goethean ॐ 19:08, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

• delete; totally OR. Brighterorange 19:49, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; OR and it doesn't conform to some of the most basic standards of style on wikipedia. Mistercow 21:10, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Hopelessly original research. Tobycat 21:27, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• delete Not NPOV. If it wasn't completely OR, I would say that nearly all of it was, and that the concept of ontological guilt is not at all widespread or consistent. (However, many google searches will return wikipedia articles 1st in a list--I don't think that by itself shows anything.) WhiteC 22:43, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and reading it gave me WP:BRD. =P Xaa 00:42, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete OR. Even written in first person... --Etacar11 02:02, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The term seems to have very little currency, if any. Matuszek 17:38, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.