Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most powerful jedi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Most powerful jedi)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:10, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not a speedy candidate. Clearly doesn't belong on WP--it's a fancruftish, unverifiable list (see WP:WWIN). I can't think of anywhere to redirect this to--should probably just be deleted. Meelar (talk) 21:24, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete What a pointless article. Deb 21:45, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Note that 'Cruft' is not a deletion criteria. But regardless of the nominator's reasons, I don't see this as becoming worthy of an encyclopedia enty. Sonic Mew | talk to me 21:54, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Technically, only speedy deletion has explicit criteria. VfD operates on consensus, which depends on people's personal ideas of what is or is not suitable for Wikipedia and their interpretations of policies such as WP:NOT. — Gwalla | Talk 22:31, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apparently original research, if this sort of thing can actually be called research. ManoaChild 21:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with no references it's little more than pure POV.-Poli (talk • contribs) 22:29, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
- Delete --malathion talk 23:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: 1) totally unverifiable. 2) Possibly wrong (Anakin was verified as having the most stupid-bacteria-things EVER, as in, more than YODA did, whereas Yoda seemed to be stronger in the Force than Luke was). 3) He freaking misspelled 'Anakin.' Marblespire 20:37, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV original research. JamesBurns 08:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.