Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Die Fun

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 18:15, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fast Die Fun

Band vanity --malathion ^talk 06:50, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. and may i say DARN YOU AND YOUR AUTOVFD SCRIPT BEATING ME TO THIS PAGE!=) Sasquatch讲看 06:51, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Dude...you are fast. :) This had been speedied earlier today. Just so long as it goes bye-bye. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 06:52, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment: The anon removed the VfD notice. He's taking a three-hour time out. :) I love this job. - Lucky 6.9 06:56, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - LOL.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ
Keep. It's no worse than most of the articles here. In fact it's better written than most (which doesn't say much for the general standard.) 212.101.64.4 09:22, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:N, WP:V—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 10:05:49, 2005-08-11 (UTC)
Delete NN. Sorry. --Marcus22 14:05, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete if it already deleted once. And how can the VFD edit be the first one? --Howcheng 20:22, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn band vanity. --Etacar11 23:12, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete--Cyberjunkie | Talk 06:36, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Band vanity -- Cnwb 12:17, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete -- tis well written though! hope the author keeps contributing Erich 15:40, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.