Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EGM NGR

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk 14:46, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

EGM NGR

Non-notable off-topic forum, and the article as-written has no encyclopedic content whatsoever. What it does have is lots of personal attacks, though, and keeping it will probably attract more. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 09:33, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, forumcruft. — JIP | Talk 09:53, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete forumcruft, and a particularly horrid example of it at that. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:19, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
Delete -- Longhair | Talk 14:38, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, forumcruft, and quite non-notable. JogCon 19:20, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete, it's amusing that people argue that this is not worthy of being included in an encyclopedia, when this site also has articles on Yatta and the All Your Base memes. I just do not see any harm in leaving this here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.57.144 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 4 August 2005
Delete web forum vanity. -- Cyrius|✎ 04:27, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete I cannot think of a valid reason to delete this, as it seems so utterly harmless — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.57.144 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 5 August 2005
Delete as per nominator.--nixie 06:31, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.