Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Jasper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/David Jasper)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. --Tony SidawayTalk 10:19, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I could not confirm any of the given information to be true with Google. Anyone else? feydey 11:39, 24 August 2005 (UTC) Keep the updated version, good work Doc, feydey 15:08, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteor find out notability, google turns up empty for the k corridor theory or whatever which is usually a good sign --Ryan Norton T | @ | C 11:43, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Keep Updated version looks better --Ryan Norton T | @ | C 14:34, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per submitter. Corridor theory (sans K) seems valid, but "corridor theory" +jasper turns up nothing. --GraemeL (talk) 12:07, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Thanks to Doc for taking the time to re-write the entry. --GraemeL (talk) 14:36, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep I get lots of Google hits for "David Jasper" who is quite notable in the field of Theology and Religious Studies - see e.g. [1] Dlyons493 13:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The David Jasper you found may be worthy of an entry, but comparing his bio on the Glasgow University site to the article makes me doubt it's the same person. I strongly suspect a hoax. "Sir David is Married to Victoria" just screams David Beckham. Nothing in the article seems verifiable. If somebody wants to re-write the article to reference the David Jasper you found, I'll consider changing my vote. --GraemeL (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless re-written. Prof Jasper (who was, incidently, one of my lecturers) is certainly a notable accademic, but this isn't him. --Doc (?) 13:58, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- On the basis of {so fix it}, I have, so keep --Doc (?) 14:28, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep rewritten version--good work, Doc. Meelar (talk) 14:33, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Doc's rewritten version which shows he is a notable academic with plenty of books to his credit. Capitalistroadster 17:01, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.