Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brawly (Pokémon)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was CLOSED. Nominator has recommended delisting, and the nomination was in effect an accident anyway. Splash 17:03, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Brawly (Pokémon)

A one-off Pokemon trainer with no personality or backstory. Makes only a single appearance in a single matched trio of Pokemon games. Non-notable gamecruft. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 11:28, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Gym leaders, like individual Pokemon, are notable. He is important in Ash's quest on the show and important to the player in the games. Let PAC expand it a bit. Ryan 11:31, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
STRONG Keep Notable recurring character from multiple games/episodes. The Pokemon Adoption Center is actively working on expanding Pokemon stubs into real articles. With some 25+ members, the PAC has expanded 50 stubs in the past week alone and nearly 200 articles total. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:04, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Delist. While Brawly only appears in one matched set of games and one episode of the anime and no chapters of the manga (I checked before posting this VFD), this is better off merged than deleted. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 12:16, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This is patently false. Brawly appears in several Manga chapters. See [1] for evidence. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:29, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
  - By all means, then, please help me expand List of Johto Gym Leaders. It's look a bit sparse at the moment. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 12:33, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - No, they need individual articles. You can't just do something as sweeping as that with no consensus or discussion. At least just trial it, don't redirectise the articles with battle info in them! I'm going to revert. --Celestianpower ^talk 12:37, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - This needs expanding, but we can sort it and going on past record with pokémon, we'll do it very soon! --Celestianpower ^talk 12:21, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:PAC seems to be the rebirth of the Wikiproject Pokédex... Almafeta 13:07, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.