Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 July 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Righeira as redundant to it. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Righeira singles with Template:Righeira.
No need for a separate singles navbox when {{Righeira}} lists the same songs and is more than sufficient for navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unused and superseded. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary given existence of {{Wikidata}}; recently created by someone blocked for template-space disruption. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Doesn't appear to work, the documentation page is just plagiarised from another template and doesn't actually have any relevance to this page, saves no typing compared to {{wikidata|alias}} which is actually functional, I'm struggling to think of any situations where "getting a random synonym for the page title from wikidata" would actually be useful. 192.76.8.85 (talk) 03:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template recently created by someone blocked for disruption in template-space. No apparent use. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two articles outside the main subject. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator's rationale. NatureBoyMD (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox NCAA ice hockey season. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox NCAA University Division ice hockey season with Template:Infobox NCAA ice hockey season.
Just need to add a parameter to determine whether to display "Division I" or "University Division". –Aidan721 (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me. So long as the pages are historically accurate I don't see any problem with a merger PensRule11385 (talk) 21:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 12. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary template. No games were played in 2021. Thus, no standings. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 12. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused military rank template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Subst on 2020–21 New Zealand Football Championship. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unused duplicates of already-in-use non-templated tables. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All unused as the information is now part of the 2021 New Zealand National League. No need for these templates anymore. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as single-use. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Subst on 2012 Parramatta Eels season. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subsitute and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused squad box template. 2009 Parramatta Eels season has the list of players in a different style. Probably should be substituted on the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subsitute and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion replaced. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox tennis cup team. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox FedCup with Template:Infobox tennis cup team.
Only 3 transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template replaced with {{Infobox FIVB tournament}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox sports league. Primefac (talk) 11:36, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox field hockey league with Template:Infobox sports league.
Low use and allows for consistency across sports with merge to {{Infobox sports league}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox college football game. Primefac (talk) 11:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox college football single game, Template:Infobox college football single game mini header, Template:Infobox NCAA football yearly game and Template:Infobox NCAA FCS football yearly game into Template:Infobox college football game.
Five different infobox templates to achieve the same infobox template for a football game is overly unnecessary. Much easier to consolidate these templates into a single standardized infobox. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The club Royal Excel Mouscron no longer exists; it was dissolved. This template is no longer useful because it is supposed to include current members of the club's squad. However, the club has no squad because it doesn't exist. So, delete. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox NCAA Division I basketball season. No opposition. As always, please consider the caveats expressed by the supporters. Primefac (talk) 11:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox NCAA Division I women's basketball season with Template:Infobox NCAA Division I men's basketball season.
Can be merged to target {{Infobox NCAA Division I basketball season}} with added parameter for gender. See usage by NCAA ice hockey for men's and women's seasons here. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox college track and field team , though if leaving off the "team" is desirable from a "brevity" standpoint, feel free to merge it back that way (and if not, leave a redirect in place?). Primefac (talk) 11:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox college track and field with Template:Infobox college track and field team.
Duplicate template. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge There doesn't seem to be any significant difference between the pages that use one template and the pages that use the other, so it would make sense for all of them to look the same. (I don't have any opinion on which template's code or rendered appearance is better, so don't mind which way the merge is done.) Note that the templates are USA-specific, and it might make sense to mention that in their names. --ais523 20:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused rail station wrapper. Gonnym (talk) 07:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete. It doesn't seem worth having a template wrapper to hardcode one parameter, especially one with such a short name – if something similar were done for every rail system in the world, we would rapidly run out of short template names (and also confuse the users who worked on the articles). As such, it would need a longer name (something like {{Kyiv Metro station link}}) to be usable, but that isn't any shorter or clearer than {{station link|Kyiv Metro}}, so there's no real value to having a template here at all.

    This is currently unused, but if anyone adds a use while the TfD is in progress, the use should be substed rather than removed. --ais523 20:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under WP:G8, though one could just as easily make the argument that a sandbox does not strictly need deleting and could be blanked. However, this is an unusually-named sandbox/subpage so I see no reason why this discussion needs to extend further. Primefac (talk) 09:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sandbox using a module that was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Galobtter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 09:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and seems to duplicate Template:Infobox church/denomination, which is used. Gonnym (talk) 07:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:55, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While this not being used is very likely, the fact that it isn't linked from any page, does not have a talk page and the template's only editor is its creator suggests this is not something the community is using. Gonnym (talk) 07:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This seems like it would be connected to some "informal mediation" process, but all of those appear to have shut down: it links to Wikipedia:Mediation which in turn links to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation and Wikipedia:Mediation Committee, all of which are now inactive. So it seems like this is the sort of thing which, if it were to be used, we'd want some sort of community guidelines about how to use it, and reflect those in the template. (With so many failed attempts, it's probably necessary to work out what we're doing wrong before trying again!) We don't have those, so there's nothing to reflect. --ais523 21:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
    Oh, I just realised that the current location is Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, which doesn't need this template. So my reasoning was slightly off, but not the conclusion. --ais523 21:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused United Kingdom cadet forces templates. Gonnym (talk) 07:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/VCC. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused link list template. Gonnym (talk) 06:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G7 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 11:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Qbuzz Stoptrein. Gonnym (talk) 06:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bus succession templates. Gonnym (talk) 06:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bus succession templates. Gonnym (talk) 06:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused banner which should never be used on pages anyways. Gonnym (talk) 06:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I am an organizer for this project. This template was never used and will never be used because it describes activity which happens at Meta-Wiki. Bluerasberry (talk) 02:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 14. Primefac (talk) 11:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused citation. Gonnym (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table. Gonnym (talk) 06:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Outdated, unused, most of the links in it don't make a lot of sense, I can't think of any realistic use for a comparison of two politician's 2006 era views on a range of issues. 192.76.8.85 (talk) 11:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused citation. Gonnym (talk) 06:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image. Gonnym (talk) 06:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map and table. Constituencies of Finland uses a different set. Gonnym (talk) 06:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox sports league. Primefac (talk) 11:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox athletic conference with Template:Infobox sports league.
Users expect consistency in syntax and style when looking at sports leagues and conferences, including Southeastern Conference and National Football League, so we must present these in the same manner. Parameter usage is pretty close. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge DerVogel999 (talk) 23:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure the only unique field is “sports fielded” so merge CreecregofLife (talk) 06:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Single-use World Championships in Athletics medalists templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 14. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).