Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 13
May 13
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 21. (non-admin closure) EggRoll97 (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:High_heels (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Footwear (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 21. (non-admin closure) EggRoll97 (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Parts_of_a_crown (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Types_of_crowns (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. It sounds like this specific template, as it stands, is not really useful since the corresponding de-wiki template has been split/deleted. No issues with a "refund" if the code is desired to create a new subst-only wrapper to make transitioning between de-wiki templates and en-wiki pages easier. Primefac (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
de:Vorlage:Infobox Austrian Landesstraße (or de:vorlage:Infobox Landesstraße Österreich) no longer exists, so this is no longer needed for translation functions. Imzadi 1979 → 13:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Not quite true. All that's happened is that they've split the template into two: one for B roads and one for L roads. If we delete this, we'll lose the code needed to shim both of those. Also please note there is a separate move discussion for this template. My sense is that we should move this in line with that move proposal and tweak the code so it deals at least with the B roads and, ideally, the L roads as well, to avoid having two shims. Bermicourt (talk) 15:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Could you point to the de pages please? I couldn't find them. --Gonnym (talk) 17:42, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, yes. There are two templates, but not with the names I mentioned above. For major roads (motorways, dual carriageways, state highways) there is de:Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße and for urban roads there is de:Vorlage:Infobox Straße. These are the equivalent of Template:Infobox road. The two templates I referred to above for B and L roads are for a different purpose. Bermicourt (talk) 21:11, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Could you point to the de pages please? I couldn't find them. --Gonnym (talk) 17:42, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- delete since the German version was deleted. if someone wants to create "subst only"
{{Infobox hochrangige Straße}}/{{Infobox Straße}}that would be more useful for translating. Frietjes (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)- if created, those should be "Template:Infobox road/hochrangige Straße" and "Template:Infobox road/Straße", in keeping with other members of Category:Infobox importer templates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:07, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- delete per Frietjes. * Pppery * survives 20:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Replace and delete with Template:Infobox settlement Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
District-specific wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
Regions, towns, villages etc. already transclude {{Infobox settlement}} directly.
Infobox usage on articles about places in Slovakia |
78.55.157.228 (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Replace and delete per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Replace and delete per nom. Simplify editing and maintenance. TerraCyprus (talk) 16:15, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:50, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
it:Template:Infobox Autostrada-it, which this template purports to import, was deleted in 2012, rending this template redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:40, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - unless this is used to import something else, this is no longer needed. --Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- There was a previous TfD in 2010, which resulted in "keep". – Uanfala (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- That was before the target template was deleted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per G7. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Only serves to copy contents of Template:Editnotices/Page/Barack Obama, which has been blanked; notice obsolete, since Wikipedia:General sanctions/Obama article probation has expired DannyS712 (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to Amanita muscaria. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:48, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Amanita variety (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only contents are article contents, which should be added directly to articles rather than through a template per WP:TG. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:09, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Merge - Agree this should be moved to an article. I imagine this was intended to be in all the articles for varieties of Amanita muscaria, which seems to be about three that are not redirects. It probably would be best added to the species article. --Nessie (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Now that I see it's an option, I support a merge to Amanita muscaria. That was essentially my intention when copying the content over. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
GRTC s-line templates
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:GRTC color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:GRTC lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:GRTC stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
S-line data modules
|
|---|
{{S-line}} templates for the Greater Richmond Transit Company, mostly GRTC Pulse. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/GRTC. All transclusions replaced. There are also two dependent s-line data modules to be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 00:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).