Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 9

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:31, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stumbling across this template, I initially planned to update it and include it in the articles which it is mentioned; currently only one article (Everything Is Fine (The Good Place)) includes it. However, with only six relevant articles, I don't think there's enough for a navbox. I've recreated the category Category:The Good Place (which was previously deleted when there weren't even enough articles for a category), so this should still aid navigation for readers. (If deleted, the template could be recreated without prejudice if a few more articles on The Good Place are made e.g. if show continues into future series.) Bilorv(c)(talk) 19:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I think the minimum is 5 links so the template should be recreated once an article for the next season is made, article on a character or more articles on more episodes. Matt14451 (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New template used to spam links to a Wiki based user-generated site ..... more egregious is the fact that the links don't land on relevant results. Moxy (talk) 07:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:53, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Should be substed and deleted. Izno (talk) 02:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).