Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) WBGconverse 12:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This subtemplate is no longer used, per this search result and this search result. I found it being used inappropriately in three articles, and I replaced those transclusions with {{Date}}, which is much more useful and flexible. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Scandinavia. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:History of Scandinavia with Template:Scandinavia.
Redundancy. Chicbyaccident (talk) 23:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --woodensuperman 16:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) WBGconverse 12:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --woodensuperman 16:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 December 14. (non-admin closure) WBGconverse 12:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. There seems an overall consensus to keep the current state where the three templates are wrappers. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:MOS-TM, Template:MOS-TW, Template:MOS-NB and Template:MOS-TRANS.
No reason to have four different templates when content on trans men, trans women and non-binary people are treated the same on Wikipedia. feminist (talk) 05:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).