Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 10
July 10
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was merge (NAC) Frietjes (talk) 17:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Graphic MSP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Monica's Gang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Graphic MSP with Template:Monica's Gang.
Minor template with just five articles, including the main one. Could be easily merged with Template:Monica's Gang, and readers would certainly benefit from all Monica's Gang-related content becoming accessible from the same template. Victão Lopes Fala! 17:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- sure, why not. Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC) Template:Isotope sup sub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Propose deletion
Template is not used, and implements a subset of the features in {{Physics particle}}.— SkyLined (talk) 20:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Merge to {{sup sub}} with a parameter switch
|small=yesas a variant display of sup sub. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm against this, as any future changes made to {{Physics particle}} might not apply to {{sup sub}}, which might create inconsistent layout between physics particles created with the two different templates. It's just easier to maintain consistent look and feel of all such particles if they are all generated using the same template. 83.84.60.13 (talk) 11:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- A merger does not preclude replacement of the current uses with {{physics particle}}. What I want to keep is the presentation produced by this template. Whether it is used in isotopes ever again is immaterial to my opinion. After the merger {{isotope sup sub}} will be deleted anyways. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm against this, as any future changes made to {{Physics particle}} might not apply to {{sup sub}}, which might create inconsistent layout between physics particles created with the two different templates. It's just easier to maintain consistent look and feel of all such particles if they are all generated using the same template. 83.84.60.13 (talk) 11:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.