Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Super World Champions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:Super World Champions[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Super World Champions (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Da D00d Uploader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
UltraNintendoEntertainmentSystem (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
King of America (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
NintendoDSKing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Kariteh (talk) 08:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
Note: Apart from NintendoDSKing, these accounts are actually already blocked per an older sockpuppet case (Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/King of America). Because of this, the evidence I'll show are from 2007. However, NintendoDSKing had managed to pass "below the radar" the previous time and wasn't listed in the case nor blocked as a result of it, and he has started to edit again since January 2008.
The evidence for NintendoDSKing being a sockpuppet are the same as those given for the other accounts in that old case:
- American bias shown by replacing European video game cover arts with American cover arts:
- Edit warring on the same articles as User:A Link to the Past:
- Unrelated articles which possibly show similar editing interests (between most of them for the most part):
- Wrestling articles (WWE video games)
- Virtual Console-related articles
- 200X in video gaming
- List of Wii games
- Touch! Generations-related articles
- Personality:
- Comments
This looks right. I think an admin should block NintendoDSKing. The reason he slipped under the radar is that his first edit, on July 12, 2007, was two days after a previous sock was blocked. An edit on that day was cited as a diff above in continuing a revert war. That alone is sufficient to justify an indefinite block for a block-evading sockpuppet. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
Agreed and done. — Rlevse • Talk • 13:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]