Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NPOVfan9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:NPOVfan9[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer: NPOVfan9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets: Altai Khan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); NPOVfan8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

ناهد/(Nåhed) _speak! 21:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Name, editing of previously identified sockpuppet ban information, etc. He also appears to be using a revert-bot to keep his newest page blanked. It instantly reverts both his userpage and his talk page.

Comments

User:Emilyzilch is edit warring on my new user page [1][2] instead of answering to my comments to his earlier same accusations Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/NPOVfan8 Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Altai Khan.

e.g. he is spamming and edit warring NPOVfan9 (talk) 21:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not edit warring. I merely reported a possible sock puppet and you reverted the tags. ناهد/(Nåhed) _speak! 22:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

of course you are edit warring, look at my user page history and user talk history.

According to the page that you advised me to read you should have requested a checkuser within 10 days. You didn't. so you are only spamming with your same accusation. NPOVfan9 (talk) 22:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

See block logs of all three, all have been blocked indef by other admins. Cirt (talk) 11:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]