Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mobile 01 (2nd)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Mobile_01[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Mobile_01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Mobile 01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
203.49.235.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Travb (talk) 22:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

User:Bobblehead "...I'd probably characterize the undiscussed nature of the removal as vandalism, especially considering the editor is probably User:Mobile 01, who has a history of edit warring over the article in order to remove negative content." [1],
User:Brusegadi "Thanks. I agree with that." [2]
User:AnonEMouse "the similarities are large, the contention has been going on for a long time, and the last edits should be recent enough." [3]

...suspect both editors are the same.

Both editors edit the same pages:

With Firestone Tire and Rubber Company‎ both editors have been in protracted edit wars. User:203.49.235.50 has gotten a 3RR and edit warnings for this page.[4][5]

User:Mobile 01 continues to deny that she is this editor as recently as September 17[6]Travb (talk) 22:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Please see this [7] β^_command 04:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page lists all edits of anon and Mobile 01. Travb (talk) 08:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

I'd say it's quite likely that the IP and User:Mobile 01 are the same person, but I don't see any obvious violations of WP:SOCK. If the accounts have been used to jointly violate 3RR, double vote, or engage in protracted edit warring, diffs should be presented, and then I'll consider blocking. But at this point I don't see a reason to do so. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]