Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/MaidService

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:MaidService[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

MaidService (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

ThaCleaningLady (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
BombBuilder (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

DiligentTerrier^{and friends} 21:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

ThaCleaningLady's contributions
MaidService's contributions
BombBuilder's contributions
MaidService's template deletion nomination - also notice comments at that page.

Comments

These edits seem very complex for first edits. I think that there is an experienced user involved in this sockpuppetry. DiligentTerrier^{and friends} 21:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what? None of their edits are disruption or circumventing policy. –Pomte 03:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well they were double voting on the template deletion page. DiligentTerrier^{and friends} 18:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Vote stacking is a violation of WP:SOCK and this case is blatant. Tagged all. Blocked socks and "master" indef. I suspect there is another real master out there. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also New checkuser evidence. DiligentTerrier^{and friends} 20:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]