Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/JRS-SEC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
JRS-SEC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Chopped Lamb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Orange Mike | Talk 17:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
This single-purpose account is on a vendetta against a former boiler-room broker named Ronald Bongo who's now in the software industry. In order to circumvent the deletions(see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ronald_Bongo) of Ronald Bongo, the puppeteer created the sock puppet (Chopped Lamb = Lamb Chop; get it?) and the sockpuppet created US SEC Boiler Room Prosecutions. The links, the edit style, the accusations and wikilawyering; all are identical between puppeteer and puppet.
- Comments
This should be a relatively quick one for an uninvolved admin to review.
I am familiar with the previous incarnation of this user, as JRS-SEC. This is most definitely the same person, for exactly the reasons laid out by Orange Mike above. I love WP:IAR as much as the next person, but really feel I was so involved with the previous account's contributions (and as I said in the AfD, about 2 seconds from blocking them myself), that I think I qualify as "involved admin", and won't block this time. But I do advocate blocking. This user has demonstrated a lack of desire to conform to our policies; stern warnings have been done to death. --barneca (talk) 18:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't see deleted contribs, but based on what I can see, this looks like a disruptive sockpuppet. You could justify blocking for either disruption or sockpuppetry alone; the combination makes it an easy decision. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 19:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
Quack. Blocked. GBT/C 21:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]