Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Exxess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Exxess[edit]

Suspected sock puppeteer

Exxess (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Suspected sock puppet

Eastern876 (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

PROVE IT, Poeticbent. ANYTHING I've written, I SIGN. Eastern876 IS NOT ME. Your case for delete is weak and far from obvious; but that's no justification for an accusation of double voting. PROVE IT. The burden is on YOU. Sorry if it that seems harsh, but it's truthful. Your case regarding citations in the article nominated for deletion WAS EXTREMELY WEAK, so now you resort to this? RIDICULOUS. Or does innocent until PROVEN guilty not apply on Wikipedia? FOR THE RECORD -- Eastern876 IS NOT ME. You are simply casting aspersions, Poeticbent. Exxess (talk) 08:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Report submission by

Poeticbent talk 05:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Suspected double-voting in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radwan Dąbrowski-Żądło Family (3rd nomination) to increase the apparent support for a position. [1] Repeated violations of WP:CIV (i.e.: taunting, and generally aggressive behaviour).

FALSE, Poeticbent. Quit resorting to underhanded and below-the-belt tactics, and stick to point-to-point rebuttal, RATHER THAN MAKING FALSE ACCUSATIONS that you cannot prove.

QUOTING WP:CIV:

"Differences of opinion are inevitable in a collaborative project. When discussing these differences some editors, in trying to be forthright, can seem unnecessarily harsh." Exxess (talk) 06:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My IP address ALL DAY has been 71.104.219.109. Provide SPECIFIC EVIDENCE, Poeticbent. State Eastern876's IP address. THAT IS NOT ME. This is an extremely poor attempt on Poeticbent's part to cast aspersions. Exxess (talk) 08:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also see Poeticbent has treated Wikipedia as a battleground.

QUOTE: "Poeticbent

26) Poeticbent (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) has treated Wikipedia as a battleground ([36]); his actions to that effect have included violations of the BLP policy ([37]).

Passed 8 to 0 at 00:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC)"

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2

Exxess (talk) 09:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Both accounts listed as possibly linked to the sock puppetry in question (instructions) have been notified.

Conclusions

An account whose first and only act is to comment on a contentious AfD is quacking so loudly that I've blocked it per WP:DUCK. No action on the main user; the only way to prove the sockmaster would be RFCU. Closed. Black Kite 11:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]